Chelsea defeated Fulham 2-0, and there were three controversial penalty decisions in this game, three of which were related to goals. The following are three penaltys, please comment! The first controversial penalty: In the 22nd minute of the game,...
Chelsea defeated Fulham 2-0, and there were three controversial penalty decisions in this game, three of which were related to goals. The following are three penaltys, please comment!
The first controversial penalty: In the 22nd minute of the game, Fulham made a one-on-one chance, and 18-year-old player Jin dunked the defender and pushed the ball into the goal. After VAR reminded, the referee went to the sidelines to look back and finally determined that Munis had a foul on Charoba first and the goal was invalid.
The referee read out the penalty explanation: After review, Fulham No. 9 player made a reckless foul and stepped on the Chelsea defender's foot, so we canceled the goal and Chelsea restarted the free kick. No further punishment.
The second controversial penalty:
In the 9th minute of stoppage time in the first half, Enzo took the corner kick, Pedro scored a header, and Chelsea led 1-0!
The official stoppage time in the first half was 8 minutes, and Pedro scored in the 9th minute.
The third controversial penalty: In the 55th minute of the game, Sesenion handballed, VAR intervened and the referee awarded a penalty kick, Enzo scored!
The referee looked back for a long time and checked three suspected fouls. First, Pedro was suspected of handball, followed by Kesédo's suspected foul when intercepted the ball, and finally a handball in the penalty area.
The referee read out the penalty explanation: After verification, the Fulham No. 30 player stretched his arms when blocking the cross to make his body unnaturally expand. So my final penalty was a penalty.
source:tỷ số bóng đá trực tuyến 7m
