Is intermittent fasting really helpful for weight loss? The professor tells you the truth: nothing to do with the rest

I posted on 2021-6-6 that the winner of Nobel found that having a stomach is healthier? A little bit of health is nonsense, reader ccc left a message on 2023-7-18: "Intermittent fasting really does not help lose weight? It seems that I have see...


I posted on 2021-6-6 that the winner of Nobel found that having a stomach is healthier? A little bit of health is nonsense, reader ccc left a message on 2023-7-18:

"Intermittent fasting really does not help lose weight? It seems that I have seen many doctors recommend it. Are they also doing it for money? Some friends have tried it, and those who are indeed thin, and the theory that doctors say looks reasonable. This is different faction. Do you have the same idea? Every comment has different supporters. Sometimes I feel so confused when I read it more."

I replied that day: "Is it because the reduction in Calorie's intake has nothing to do with the rest." At the same time, I attached a latest study on the limited-time dietary diet method I published on April 23, 2022. Is it effective? . This article cites a paper just published in the New England Journal of Medical Sciences Calorie Restriction with or without Time-Restricted Eating in Weight Loss. The conclusion of this article is that in obese patients, a time-limited diet regimen is no more beneficial in reducing weight, fat or healing risk factors than daily limiting of heat.

In fact, I quoted an article published on September 28, 2020, in the American Medical Association journal JAMA. Eating on Weight Loss and Other Metabolic Parameters in Women and Men With Overweight and Obesity: The TREAT Randomized Clinical Trial. The conclusion of this article is: without other precautions, eating time is not more effective than eating all day.

is also true and top medical journal Annals of Internal Medicine just published two articles in June that were also about time-limited diets. The research paper title is Time-Restricted Eating Without Calorie Counting for Weight Loss in a Racially Diverse Population. Its conclusion is: "Compared with control, limited time diet is more effective in reducing weight, but it is not more effective in people with diverse ethnic groups than restricting Calorie."

This conclusion is what I said, "Weight loss is because the reduction in Calorie's input is irrelevant to intervals." Another article published by the vernacular of the Institutional Science is an editing review, titled Time-Restricted Eating for Treatment of Obesity? The Devil Is in the (Counseling) Details【Term-limited diet to treat obesity? The devil is in the (Advisory) details].

From this title, you can see that if you want to use a limited-time diet to treat obesity, you need to consult a nutritionist to achieve your goal. This review also reiterates that "limited time diet is not more effective than restricting Calorie."

So, as the end, I repeated the hype and reality of the diet again: "All diets that reduce weight seem to be equally effective or equally ineffective. To be sure, most diets that reduce weight will eventually fail because people will give up the diet that is difficult to maintain for a long time. In fact, as long as you eat less, no matter which mechanism of diet will work, the best way to reduce weight is the one that can be sustained."

Original text: Time-limited diet treats obesity? The Devil's Responsibility Edited in the Details: Gu Zihuan



Recommend News